2023.05.16

Digital Rights Archive Newsletter - Sixth edition

Much of the research currently being conducted into digital technology, online platforms, large language models, algorithms, and the like is devoted to documenting how these digital wonders are transforming our relationships with the things we take for granted. Daniel Cohen, in his consideration of what Spotify means for musicians, music and the wider society, notes that “The music I love isn’t necessarily the music I play most.” Music fans will appreciate the truth in his statement. The Cure’s Disintegration and The Afghan Whigs’ Gentlemen both mean the world to me, but their magisterial doom is so powerful as to be mood-altering: not for everyday consumption.

When CDs, cassettes and vinyl ruled the airways, this wasn’t a problem for musicians, who would get their share (fair or not) from the one-time purchase. Not so in Spotify’s streaming world, driven by advertising, micropayments based on individual listens and recommendation algorithms. As Cohen notes, this format transforms our relationship to music, creating algorithmic blandification that serves up the next average song the company predicts someone like you would be okay with hearing. If you’re not being streamed, you don’t exist.

Spotify is just one example of how tech companies are rewiring society around their own interests, whether it’s recommender algorithms that blandify music selection while impoverishing artists, or promoting a universal basic income to make up for the anticipated (hoped-for?) mass-unemployment to be caused by AI, as discussed here by Anton Jäeger and Daniel Z. Vargas. Or how data extraction is reworking and reinforcing neo-colonial relations between the Global North and the Global South, with Catriona Gray’s article offering a timely engagement developing and refining the idea of data colonialism as something more than just data extraction.

With this transformation comes the need to think through how we can respond. This month’s newsletter features a few people trying to work through exactly this challenge. Sheila Jasanoff thinks through the rights and IA question, while Maximilian Kasy argues for democratic control over AI, since such systems by definition creates winners and losers, and the choice of outcomes a system favours will be determined by those who control the (in a delightful turn of phrase) “means of prediction.”

Bonus points to Kasy for actually defining AI as “autonomous systems that maximize some notion of reward”. Given the speed at which AI has become a catchphrase, we should all be like Kasy and never use the term without first defining it.

In a video based on his article of the same name, Kean Birch also wonders what is to be done, in this case with firms – platforms – that, he argues, control the knowledge we need for markets to function. I don’t know if markets are dead, but his contention that these platforms are become markets does resonate with the recent Canadian debate over Bill C-11, the Online Streaming Act. Historically, Canadian cultural policy debates have taken place along a state vs markets axis: intervention to protect and promote Canadian culture, or let the market decide? But in its current iteration, cultural creation and dissemination is taking place within self-contained platforms. This change has moved the choice to being between whether the state or private companies/platforms should shape Canadian culture.

Writing in Jacobin, meanwhile, Leif Weatherby offers a novel use for large language models, as a culture – or more specifically, an ideology – machine. Large language models, like ideology, he argues, averages out experience and groups words together based on proximity, and in doing so reveals hegemony at work: the “dominant set of ideas” at play.

On the cultural side, this month we’re featuring work, from Joseph Vogl and Ivan Boldyrev, on how social media companies make money from online anger, and, from Ahmed Al-Rawi, Betty B.B. Ackah and Wendy H.K. Chun, on how context/medium – in this case Twitter – shapes public interactions, here considering nine Black Canadian politicians. It will likely surprise no one that the medium does not come off well, if we’re interested in productive public-policy interactions between citizens and politicians. Yet another transformation, and yet another thing to fix.

- Blayne Haggart

Journalism
Journalism
Document
Book
Article
Journalism
Podcast
Video
Video
Article